新利18luck在线

太多的糖对你不好，每个人都知道。事实上，糖的声誉是，英国的一半以上人们现在有利于含糖食物和饮料税。但是，守护者数据编辑Alberto Nardelli，罪孽税是回归的。并通过来自世界各地的数据来判断，他们甚至不起作用。

课程想法
1.糖税将是课堂辩论的好主题。你可以将班级分为两阶段，并让他们为或反对这一提议而准备论证：“这所房子相信政府应该引入持有肥胖危机的糖税。”当学生能够更好地占据自己的观点时，视频可以在辩论之后显示。
2.使用下面的成绩单创建间隙填充活动。点击这里看到我创建的一个clickschool.（更多中的哪个在后面的帖子中）。

还要看看
•教师迷你辩论指南(它)
•进行课程辩论的必要提示（BusyTeacher）
•糖税辩论（经济帮助）
•苏打水和其他含糖饮料是否应该征税？（WSJ）
•糖是新的罪恶吗?支持和反对的论点(独立)
•为什么苏打税不起作用(财富)

成绩单
害怕糖的健康风险得到很好的成立，现在超过一半的英国人都赞成糖税。但这是答案吗？数字加起来吗？平坦的间接税，如罪恶税，达到最贫穷的最贫困。人们在底部第五次的收入流喝了中度，烟雾，驾驶汽车在罪税和增值税中花费约37％的一次性家庭收入。最高五分之一的人中的比较人物是15％，并且很少有证据表明，含糖饮料价格的增加揭示了人们走向更健康的替代品。2011年10月，丹麦在饱和脂肪含量高的食物上引入了税收。肥胖的措施制作披萨，油，乳制品，培根和黄油更昂贵。但是一年后，税收了涨潮。为什么？ Well, authorities said the measure had inflated food prices so much that jobs were at risk, and some people were just crossing the border to Germany to get their food. Also, sellers can just discount the prices. For example, in Berkeley, California where a sugar tax was adopted, only 22 percent of it was passed on to consumers. So the shops were taking the hit. In the US, consumption of fizzy drinks has fallen by 25 percent over the past decade, but this is largely due to the wider awareness around health and other policies. It's also fallen in places where there hasn't been any talk of a sugar tax, so it can't all be down to one single policy. So, make no mistake, sugary soft drinks have a ruinous effect on people's health, and government must do something to tackle the obesity crisis, but before we introduce a sugar tax, we need to get our numbers in order.

相关文章

漫画:Sugarholics匿名